THE GUARDIAN – Your polyester sweater is destroying the environment. Here’s why

THE GUARDIAN – Your polyester sweater is destroying the environment. Here’s why

Boycotting polyester would reduce microfiber pollution. But the larger problem is the sheer volume of clothing we buy and discard

Red and purple shirts on wooden hangers<br>Red and purple casual shirts on wooden hangers, isolated on white.

‘Shifting away from synthetic fabrics is one way to reduce microplastics in the ocean.’ Photograph: AnikaSalsera/Getty Images/iStockphoto

Last modified on Fri 23 Oct 2020 13.09 EDT

Last week, an exclusive Guardian report revealed that a mind-boggling 13.3 quadrillion microfibers (infinitesimal strands of fabric) were released into the California environment in 2019.

All fabrics release microfibers, whether they are organic, like hemp and wool, or synthetic, like polyester and acrylic. Since their discovery in 2011 by ecologist Mark Browne, much of the conversation surrounding microfibers has focused on synthetic fibers in particular. That’s because, as a product of the petrochemical industry, synthetic fabric is essentially plastic, making the microfibers it releases a form of microplastic pollution. As the California study suggests, plastic microfibers are a disturbingly abundant foreign substance in the Earth’s ecosystem – they make up 90% of the microplastic pollution in the Atlantic Ocean, and are easily ingested by the tiny fish and plankton that support the entire marine ecosystem.

While larger pieces of plastic garbage in the ocean are largely attributed to poor waste management in rapidly developing economies, microfiber pollution is predominantly linked to wastewater from developed nations, according to an article recently published by the American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists. Clothing releases the most microfibers while being machine-washed, and many of those fibers elude filtration in treatment centers, ultimately ending up in waterways and oceans. One study from 2017 even found that 83% of global tap water samples contained microfibers.

So, is the solution to stop buying synthetic clothing?

“Shifting away from synthetic fabrics is one way to reduce microplastics in the ocean,” says Dr Brian Hunt, a biological oceanographer at the University of British Columbia. “Decreasing the demand for synthetics would decrease production.”

Recently, some retailers have marketed “anti-microbial” or “anti-odor” clothing they claim requires only infrequent washing; Hunt considers such initiatives, as well as a movement among eco-conscious consumers to buy more organic, natural fabrics, generally encouraging.

“But still,” he says, “there’s the question of: what happens with these new approaches? Everything we do has some kind of effect. Even with natural clothing, depending on how it’s treated, there might be some contributions to pollution in the ocean.”

Wool and cotton may be chemically processed; they also require much water and energy to produce. Buying lots of fancy new environmentally friendly gear is still less sustainable than sticking with what you already have. In the same sense, boycotting polyester is good, but let’s not forget the problem of microfibers is amplified by the amount of clothing we’re producing and buying on a macro level.

The emergence of fast fashion in the early 2000s introduced consumers to cheaply made, often synthetic clothing on a massive scale. A growing middle class has helped clothing production double in the last 15 years, according to the Ellen McArthur Foundation, an environmental charity; the global clothing industry is estimated to grow from $1.9tn in 2019 to over $3tn by 2030. Textile production is the world’s second-most polluting industry, behind only oil – and every year we prematurely discard $400bn worth of clothing.

Fashion corporations must be held accountable for implementing sustainable practices across their supply chains, including developing and using sustainable fabrics that do not emit microplastics. On a consumer level, we need to ensure the trend of resale continues its encouraging trajectory by shopping thrift and vintage, renting trendy and special occasion-wear, and consigning or donating our used clothing. We can also wash our clothing less frequently and in cold, quick cycles – this reduces microfiber shedding, and helps retain the clothes’ quality, too.

Did you know that you can often recycle old clothing almost the same way you recycle bottles and cans? In many places you can bring old clothes to specific textile recycling depots or sign up for a free recycling program. In 2018, a Hong Kong textile mill even pioneered a technology which recycles waste textiles into new yarn on an unprecedented scale. The technology caught the interest of fast-fashion giants like H&M.

With effort and innovation, microfiber pollution – among the other environmental ills caused by the fashion industry at large – can be reduced. As for the quadrillions of fibers the fabrics all around you are shedding: think of them the next time you catch yourself impulse shopping for a new outfit, and perhaps take a minute to reflect on whether you have enough, already.

  • This article was amended on 23 October 2020 to reflect Dr Brian Hunt’s correct name. An earlier version incorrectly stated his name

  • Legendary Watergate reporter Bob Woodward will discuss the Trump presidency at a Guardian Live online event on Tuesday 27 October, 7pm GMT. Book tickets here

America is on a knife edge …

… as votes for the next president are tallied. The coming hours and days represent a perilous moment for US democracy. Donald Trump has declared victory, despite millions of ballots that have yet to be counted – ballots cast by voters whom the US president wishes to disenfranchise. Despite orchestrated voter suppression, and the surging pandemic, a record number of Americans turned out to elect the next president. Whatever Trump says, the election is not over until all of their votes are counted.

At a time like this, an independent news organization that fights for truth and holds power to account is not just optional, it is essential. The Guardian will continue to report the election results with caution and transparency, avoiding premature projections and countering misinformation with facts and informed analysis.

Through our Fight to vote project, the Guardian has put voter suppression at the center of our 2020 coverage, connecting the present moment to America’s long history of blocking Black Americans and other disenfranchised groups from the ballot box. This election will impact every facet of American life. But it will not be a genuine exercise in democracy if every American voter can’t freely participate – and every vote is not counted.

Like many news organizations, the Guardian has been significantly impacted by the pandemic. We rely to an ever greater extent on our readers, both for the moral force to continue doing journalism at a time like this and for the financial strength to facilitate that reporting.

We believe every one of us deserves equal access to fact-based news and analysis. We’ve decided to keep Guardian journalism free for all readers, regardless of where they live or what they can afford to pay. This is made possible thanks to the support we receive from readers across America in all 50 states.

We’d love your help so that we can carry on our essential work.If you can, support the Guardian from as little as $1 – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.

© 2020 Guardian News & Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. (modern)


Post by admin

0 Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.